He himself admitted he has $2.4 million at P80-million bank account. (To me, clearly Chief Justice Corona violated the law. Yun po siguro hindi na kasinungalin yun, yun po ay totoo na,” Lapid said. Siya mismo inamin niya na may $2.4 million at P80 million na bank account. “Para sakin po, malinaw na malinaw na si Chief Justice Corona ay lumabag sa batas. One notable vote came from another Arroyo ally, Lapid, who also cast a guilty vote for Corona. (Though very difficult, for the sake of unity and healing our nation for the sake of strengthening the institutions of the government for the sake of the next generation and our future, I find Chief Justice Renato Corona guilty.) “Napakahirap man, alang-alang sa pagkakaisa at paghihilom ng ating bayan alang alang sa pagpappatibay ng mga institusyon ng ating pamahalaan, alang alang sa mga darating pang henarasyon at ng ating kinabukasan, I find Chief Justice Renato Corona guilty,” the senator added. “I prayed hard for Divine Providence and guidance int his one great decision of my life,” Revilla said. It was Arroyo who appointed Corona as Chief Justice before the former stepped down from office in 2010. Revilla’s vote came as a surprise considering that he is a known ally of former President and now Pampanga Representative Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo. It was Revilla’s vote, who cast the 16 th “guilty” verdict, that sealed the fate of Corona because under the rules, at least two-thirds of the total members of the Senate or 16 of the 23 incumbent senators are needed to convict him. 2.3, and that his deliberate act of excluding substantial assets from his sworn Statement of Assets, Liabilities and Net Worth constitutes a culpable violation of the Constitution,” he said. Corona, guilty as charged under Article II, Par. “And so, with full trust that the Almighty will see us through the aftermath of this chapter in our nation’s history, I vote to hold the Chief Justice, Renato C. But I have constantly held that those who face the judgment of imperfect and fallible mortals like us have recourse to the judgment of history, and, ultimately, of God,” said the Senate leader. “As one who has been through many personal upheavals through all of my 88 years, I, too, have been judged, often unfairly and harshly. If Graham thinks that is “offensive” and “absurd,” he should rethink what those words actually mean.Senate Majority Leader Vicente “Tito” Sotto IIIĮnrile being the presiding officer was the last to cast his vote on the case. The vast majority of Republican senators have already settled on the this -is-unconstitutional! argument to allow them to avoid engaging with the actual facts of Trump’s months-long effort to raise questions about the election and rally his most ardent supporters to fight the results.īut for Graham to contend that what the Senate (and the rest of us) have seen over the last two days is somehow going to mean that fewer senators vote to convict Trump is a) not factually accurate and b) appalling.Īny thinking person who has watched the impeachment managers’ case over the last two days has come away with one very clear insight: The January 6 riots were really bad and, if not for a few heroes like Capitol Police officer Eugene Goodman, could have been much, much worse. Which supports the overarching reality of this trial: There just aren’t many senators who are genuinely undecided. (A supermajority - 67 senators - would need to vote for Trump’s conviction, which seems very unlikely.) Tim Scott (R) predicted Wednesday tha t “probably five and maybe six” Republican senators would cross party lines and eventually vote to convict and remove Trump from office.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |